People have discussed for ages the benefits of using
longhand versus laptops in a classroom. Pam A. Mueller and Daniel M.
Oppenheimer have done studies to try to the answer the question of, what is
better? In The Pen
is Mightier Than The Keyboard Mueller and Oppenheimer conduct three
different studies that all conclude that in conceptual tests, people who have
taken notes longhand have done significantly better than people who have taken
notes on their laptops.
The question has always been, what is the more efficient way
to take notes in order for students to do the best they can on a test? Longhand
or on laptops? The real question is, how is technology affecting the students’
education? Is it helping or hurting the minds of our nation’s youth.
Some high school teachers feel as if technology is ruining
the education system and the creativity of the students. Valerie Strauss, a
writer for The Washington Post, shared a resignation letter that a tenured
teacher, Gerald Conti, wrote to the superintendent of Westhill High school in
Syracuse, NY. Conti had been teaching at Weshtill for over twenty years before
he decided to resign. He felt that the education system was relying way too
much on technology and that the Board of Education for Westhill has “distrust,
dictating that teachers cannot be permitted to develop and administer their own
quizzes and tests (now titled as generic “assessments”) or grade their own
students’ examinations. “ Not only does Conti feel mistrusted to do his job he
also feels like the creativity of the students is being limited by online
classes and work. “This approach not only strangles creativity, it smothers the
development of critical thinking in our students and assumes a
one-size-fits-all mentality more appropriate to the assembly line than to the
classroom. “
If Mueller and Oppenheimer’s results show that students
perform significantly worse while using computers to take notes and Gerald
Conti says that computers “smother critical thinking,” is it possibly that
using a laptop in educational settings may not be as beneficial as educations
had originally thought that it would be? There ideas together seem to answer
the initial question of is technology helping or hurting the minds of our
nation’s youth. Students don’t seem to perform as well with the media aspects
in school probably because they are testing it on a generation that grew up
learning off a blackboard or a dry erase board instead of a computer. Online classes aren’t as common in high
school but they are starting to take tests and do more things online that
weren’t done before. Even though the results don’t seem to be where researchers
want them, is it necessary for teachers to start using more computers based
classes in high school to prepare their students for online college courses?
Many college courses are available online. Students take
them because they generally seem easier to pass but are they learning from them
or just receiving an A in the class? Bernard Schweizer is a tenured professor
at Duke University. He enrolled in a MOOC (Massive Open Online Course). In
Confessions of an Unreconstructed MOOC(h)her he describes how the class works. He
states that 60,000 kids can take this course and that they readings and video
lectures are optional for the students. That shows that it isn’t all about
learning, its all about how well you can do an assignment with putting in as
little work as possible. The class is
graded by peer reviews, which doesn’t give the student the satisfaction of
hearing back from a teacher why they did or didn’t pass an assignment. Online
classes like MOOC make the possibility of cheating or plagiarism jump as well
since students can work next to each other on their computers to complete
assignments and test.
Mueller and Oppenheimer’s proved that laptop use to take
notes isn’t incredibly affective so if that is put with Schweizer’s perspective
of an online MOOC class with unlimited participation based on peer reviews, how
is that an affective learning environment for college students? Student-teacher
interaction is a big deal for many students whether they realize it or not; it
makes the learning process more engaging and sitting through a class versus
taking a class online could help improve test scores since people aren’t
skipping around just to find answers to questions.
Without a doubt, the technology that has been brought into
the classrooms with computers is absolutely mind-blowing but the question still
stands, is technology helping or hurting the youth of our nation?
http://jordyherbst.blogspot.com/p/jordan-herbst-enc4404-september-252014.html
No comments:
Post a Comment